Thread: Focal Flange Distance Fix

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1 Focal Flange Distance Fix 
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    4,299
    The Thread On Blackmagic's Official Forum: http://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/vi...php?f=2&t=4319

    Direct Link to Kristian Lam's post: http://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/vi...tart=80#p34191

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristian Lam
    Hi guys,

    I want to give you an update about this issue.

    The cameras are all shimmed and calibrated to 44mm as per the reported focal flange depth of EF mount. I use the term "reported" as Canon does not publish the specifications officially so the exact expected tolerances are not known.

    When checked against a collimated cine lens, we expect the Blackmagic Cinema Camera to get accurate focus according to the witness marks on the lens. For example, at focus chart placed 6 ft from the camera sensor plane will be in focus when the witness mark on the lens is at 6 ft.

    When I tried the same collimated lens on some 5Ds, 7Ds and even a C300, the witness marks fall short of the expected distance which indicates to me that there's some fair amount of tolerances built into the Canon cameras to cater for still lenses where the tolerances are not as critical as cine lenses.

    To address this, we need to put in the same allowances. We have tested this with some of the cameras from customers reporting this and it works.

    If you think you're encountering this issue, please contact your local Blackmagic Design support office and we'll sort you out.

    Looks like you'll have to send your camera to the nearest BMD office to get it fixed, but it is a fix.

    If you send your camera back, which I imagine a lot of people will be doing, let us know how fast you had it returned, condition, how you shipped, etc etc.

    These will likely be repeated questions here.

    Eventually I'll unstick this thread, as I imagine the cameras going forward will not have this problem.

    SKYPE (best way to talk to me): Camera_Kholi | twitter
    Avery and Pete: Superseeds Feature Film Trailer
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member jambredz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kingston, Jamaica
    Posts
    4,028
    I wonder how we'll know if the camera coming from a seller is pre or post fix... I mean in this early stage. Since we have no idea when sellers get cams . And I'm talking about before one gets the cam to avoid having to send it back. I imagine later on it won't be an issue as all cams will be sent out with the fix. I also wonder if you can delay your camera shipping to get a "fixed" cam. I guess that option rests with the seller. Or maybe BM will recall the cameras which are now at the resellers and fix them before they ship... which would be a good idea.
    Last edited by jambredz; 02-27-2013 at 09:34 AM.
    Darren Scott
    Freelance Director/Director of Photography


    https://vimeo.com/jambredzvisions/videos
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    15
    This is great news and says much good about the company in my opinion. Thanks go out to Kristian Lam and the others who worked to resolve this issue.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    952
    Message i just got from bm, hopefully will have something to report eod.

    Hello Rob,

    I'm waiting to hear back from engineering as to how we are handling the Flange/infinity focus issues... apparently there has been some new developments overnight that I have not received all of the fine details yet. I will get back to you before the day is over.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member PaulDelVecchio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    923
    Just a quick note that I called BMD support in the USA and they said usually the general RMA times are 7-10 days, but in this case it might be a little longer or shorter, depending. He recommended that I send it in when I have some downtime.

    Also, they mentioned that new cameras coming out of the facility will have the new calibration rather than the old one.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Eli Hershko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    333
    Hi Paul,

    can you post a link or a phone number so we can also contact the office and make arrangements to send off our cameras?
    thanks
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Eli Hershko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    333
    Just sent my camera to California to re calibrate it... 10 business days!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    952
    Eli, did BM pay for the shipping? I'm awaiting my RMA and I'll be pissed at the principal of paying to ship a defective camera!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Steve Wake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    680
    So Canon's "nominal" 44mm flange depth turns out to have some substantial "wiggle room." I.e. it's actually less, to accommodate manufacturing tolerances. So when the BMC 44mm flange depth runs up against lenses that are designed around the "real world" spec (44mm - X), they are unable to focus at infinity.

    Should BMC be liable for not knowing the secret X-factor, which apparently is common knowledge among the other, more experienced lens and camera manufacturers? Those other mass manufacturers are apparently aware enough that they know how to make their focus-shifting, non-parfocal, AF lenses, economically built to wide manufacturing tolerances, focus at infinity on the EF mount. Personally, I think the EF mount problem is part of BMD's growing pains. Whether they should pay is a matter of corporate ethics - and will be a great test of character.

    I'm just glad the MFT standards and tolerances are transparent to members of the group (or so I assume), so this should not be a problem when the MFT version is released.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Eli Hershko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    333
    Noap... I paid 83$ with insurance to ship to them.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •