Thread: Why I'm glad I ordered Blackmagic Pocket 6K

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50
  1. #1 Why I'm glad I ordered Blackmagic Pocket 6K 
    After spending the day shooting with the 6K and 4K, I thought I'd share some initial thoughts.

    The 6K is an improvement in every way - detail, motion, noise, highlight roll off, tonality and color are all improved over the 4K. It feels like the G2 of the Pocket cams, tweaked and improved in a lot of little ways that makes for a better image overall.

    Some findings that I didn't expect:

    - 4K noise in low light at 3200 is muddier, with less detail and more chroma noise than the 6K. It's not a huge difference so definitely don't feel like your missing out if you're staying with the 4K, but I am seeing the difference. At the same ISO and f-stop, I prefer the 6K image in low light over the 4K with a speed booster (ex. 6K at f5.6 & 3200iso vs 4K at f5.6 (f4.0 boosted) at 3200iso). The image will be brighter with the speed booster on the pocket, but the noise doesn't look as nice.

    - 2.8K at 120fps is AMAZING. Much better than the 4K's 120fps at HD.

    - I'm glad to be done with speed boosters.

    - If I needed a 3rd cam, I'd get another 6K and not a 4K.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    399
    Awesome. Looking forward to color science comparisons between the Ursa G2, Alexa, and Red.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam E View Post

    The 6K is an improvement in every way - detail, motion, noise, highlight roll off, tonality and color are all improved over the 4K. It feels like the G2 of the Pocket cams, tweaked and improved in a lot of little ways that makes for a better image overall.

    I got my 6K today. I agree. The image is smooth and gorgeous. I'm impressed with how nice the UHD ProRes scales from the 6K full sensor. I haven't been able to provoke moire, it was real easy with the Pocket 4K. The bokeh on the 6K, compared to the Pocket 4K with a speedbooster is so much better. Bigger bokeh balls. Blackmagic hit it out of the ballpark again.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam E View Post
    After spending the day shooting with the 6K and 4K, I thought I'd share some initial thoughts.

    The 6K is an improvement in every way - detail, motion, noise, highlight roll off, tonality and color are all improved over the 4K. It feels like the G2 of the Pocket cams, tweaked and improved in a lot of little ways that makes for a better image overall.

    Some findings that I didn't expect:

    - 4K noise in low light at 3200 is muddier, with less detail and more chroma noise than the 6K. It's not a huge difference so definitely don't feel like your missing out if you're staying with the 4K, but I am seeing the difference. At the same ISO and f-stop, I prefer the 6K image in low light over the 4K with a speed booster (ex. 6K at f5.6 & 3200iso vs 4K at f5.6 (f4.0 boosted) at 3200iso). The image will be brighter with the speed booster on the pocket, but the noise doesn't look as nice.

    - 2.8K at 120fps is AMAZING. Much better than the 4K's 120fps at HD.

    - I'm glad to be done with speed boosters.

    - If I needed a 3rd cam, I'd get another 6K and not a 4K.
    Impressed by what I've seen so far, if it has the original Pockets highlight roll off and dynamic range I'll definitely go for one! Looking forward to using my EF glass, both native and adapted, without speedboosters. Don't need 4K, hope 2k ProRes HQ downscaled from the full the 6k sensor will be added eventually. An interesting comparison video would be side by side with the original BMCC. Besides the larger sensor and improved resolution, I'm curious how the dynamic range and colour will hold up to the original - and how much highlights and shadows can be recovered from over/under exposure. In other words a 6k Sony vs 2.5k Fairchild sensor shootout!

    In any case, I'm saving up to purchase the 6k next year.
    Last edited by SottoTerra; 08-13-2019 at 08:23 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam E View Post
    After spending the day shooting with the 6K and 4K, I thought I'd share some initial thoughts.

    The 6K is an improvement in every way - detail, motion, noise, highlight roll off, tonality and color are all improved over the 4K. It feels like the G2 of the Pocket cams, tweaked and improved in a lot of little ways that makes for a better image overall.

    Some findings that I didn't expect:

    - 4K noise in low light at 3200 is muddier, with less detail and more chroma noise than the 6K. It's not a huge difference so definitely don't feel like your missing out if you're staying with the 4K, but I am seeing the difference. At the same ISO and f-stop, I prefer the 6K image in low light over the 4K with a speed booster (ex. 6K at f5.6 & 3200iso vs 4K at f5.6 (f4.0 boosted) at 3200iso). The image will be brighter with the speed booster on the pocket, but the noise doesn't look as nice.
    Would love to see some side by side comparisons if you have the time!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,173
    Would also love to see the difference in tonality and color.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    USA N. CA
    Posts
    3,180
    You do not need to use a SB with the Pocket 4K unless you want to use EF lenses, then you might as well get the Pocket 6K.
    But for us MFT users, their is a lot of WA lens options, in native MFT and PL mounts, like the Tokina Cine 11-20, SLR Magic 10mm, and the Oly 12-100 Zoom to name a few. Unlike the previous MFT mount smaller sensor offerings from BMD, the Pocket 4K does not need super fast lenses, or the added exposure you get from a SB. Native f/1.2 and 1.4 lenses are available for shallow DOF (a SB does not change the DoF of a given lens), like the new Pana Leica 10-25 f/1.7 and the PL 42.5 f/1.2.
    Cheers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    4
    Got mine yesterday and I'm still testing it out. So far it's looking nice but I am noticing more rolling shutter than the 4k has. But it is a larger sensor so I guess that makes sense.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    408
    Make sure to check your 6K sensor. Mine had what appears to be a fingerprint on it. This is totally unacceptable.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Quote Originally Posted by Pultzar2 View Post
    Make sure to check your 6K sensor. Mine had what appears to be a fingerprint on it. This is totally unacceptable.
    Received my 6k camera today. The body of the camera has a few scuff marks on it as if it was a demo or something...
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-07-2017, 05:34 PM
  2. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-16-2013, 10:19 AM
  3. For people who ordered from BH.
    By Jeff in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 12-21-2012, 05:46 PM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-26-2012, 04:51 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2012, 01:11 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •