Thread: Everything you need to know about RED Minimags and probably others

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21  
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryanite View Post
    I think recording to an external drive would still be considered an internal recording as the camera is only saving the media to the drive not using it to create the recording - Where as an external device like an atomos recorder is doing the grunt work BUT I assume it'd but up to how the patent is worded and if a judge agrees. I'd assumed Red would do their best to word it in their favour as a sort of catch 22 where internal recording means the camera is doing the work.
    Yes, indeed, but at some point someone will have to draw the line, they can't be allowed to own and veto RAW video recording just because they filed and claimed a wide ranging patent without merit. We're not talking about RedRaw here, but simply the very concept of recording RAW video in camera which shouldn't be patentable at all. I'm aware they tried to mess around with Sony and ARRI in relationto similar 'obvious' patents but got their rears handed to them.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    542
    Quote Originally Posted by NorBro View Post
    Oh how I love what jinnimag is doing. Jared land comes off looking like a doofus especially when red just announced a 20% drop in their redmag prices but claiming that the discount was in the works before all these videos. I hope jinnimag keeps putting out more of these videos. Thankyou jinnimag for exposing a Patent trolling red camera companies true agenda.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    542
    Part 3 is up and it’s HUGE: I’ll never touch a red camera again, seems billionaires are,as expected, bully’s. Red needs to sell the company so someone can clean house or let Blackmagic take them out of the game completely.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ20yQ..._continue=1744
    Last edited by mico; 08-13-2019 at 08:58 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    133
    their arrogant fratboy users turned me off from this company long ago. I remember when they felt threatened by Magic Lantern on the 5d3. People didnt want to pay for their inflated day rates because their magical camera want so magical anymore.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    542
    The whole patent thing is amazing. A billionaire can apparently game the system by apparently falsifying info to the patent office and then apparently uses that fake info to muscle smaller companies with patent trolling.

    Who’s going to buy the krapmodo now!
    Last edited by mico; 08-13-2019 at 09:50 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    542
    Looks like apple is questioning reds patent. Yeeehaaaaa go apple go

    https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/PT...on_Redcom_314/

    Quoty4 from Jared land:Apple did not file a lawsuit against Red but rather filed two inter parties re-exam requests with the Patent Office. This is standard operating procedure for patent holders.
    We have a fantastic relationship with Apple and as they publicly announced in June RED and APPLE continue to work on incredible things.... this is all just part of the process 
    And for the people that want to challenge... it is not the first time someone has challenged the Redcode patents and it won’t be the last... and each time our patents have held fast.
    Last edited by mico; 08-15-2019 at 07:06 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •