Thread: Really nice, cheap, Veydra alternative

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 61
  1. #1 Really nice, cheap, Veydra alternative 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    425
    http://www.pocketluts.com/meike-25mm...veydra-reborn/

    tldr: +/- $300, all metal build, 180º focus throw, super sharp, nice bokeh, little focus breathing.
    Pocketluts: Purpose-built LUTs for the Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
    Pocketluts Store
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Member AndreeOnline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Zürich
    Posts
    56
    Looks kind of nice. And I believe you when you say that they are solid to the touch. But Building a metal case is probably the easy part.

    For me, they are too slow for the format and regardless of that, I wouldn't go with a lens with that amount of fringing—it jumps out of the frame under 'Distortion'.

    Then again, the thought of a set of 3 for $850 plus the P4K for $1295 makes me smile.

    Veydra would probably have had a better run if the P4K was already out. Is there no talk of a relaunch? Even so, I'm not sure those were all that great optically either?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    425
    1. It's a personal decision, but I find the idea of a T2.2 cinema lens being "too slow" kind of amusing, and certainly telling of how the DSLR revolution has impacted low budget filmmakers' tastes. I'm certainly not trying to change your mind, but at that aperture, if the subject shifts back in forth in their chair, you lose focus.

    2. I do want to emphasize that I really forced a worst case scenario for the purple fringing. Unless your job is shooting chrome cars, I don't think it would show-up very often.

    3. Obviously, the price is the main attractor. They have a better build quality than lenses costing twice as much, and the next closest "cinema" lenses aren't really cinema lenses, are plastic, and have worse image problems. I think you have to go the whole way to the Xeen (10X as expensive) for a better cinema lens. If you don't care about cinema lens practicalities, then of course there are a lot of great lenses at about 2X the cost of the Meike.

    4. Veydra's partners are mired in a legal battle and haven't released new product in a very long time. If you can find a used M43 copy, they are climbing above the price of new lenses.
    Pocketluts: Purpose-built LUTs for the Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
    Pocketluts Store
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Thanks for the review!

    Seems like a really decent glass for the price. Might get it when they release a more complete set.

    BTW T2 is plenty fast for anyone using any form of additional lighting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Member AndreeOnline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Zürich
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by joe12south View Post
    1. It's a personal decision, but I find the idea of a T2.2 cinema lens being "too slow" kind of amusing, and certainly telling of how the DSLR revolution has impacted low budget filmmakers' tastes
    I don't say it in terms of it being a worthless lens. It's just that for each format there are different tiers. For full format, as an example, you get f1.4, f2.8 and f4 lens designs. This is obviously not all there is, but I think it's fair to say that they are clear tiers of design.

    I'm always thinking about the various formats in terms of equivalence. So for me, this lens is a f4 design (not splitting hairs here or going into T vs F stop) and I'd prefer if it was a 2.8 equivalent. There's a reason you get some lenses for MFT that are f0.95 that you don't see that many of in FF.

    Since price is not an issue for me (I just don't find it an interesting aspect of a product, it's not that I have unlimited money....) I'd be more interested in one or two tiers faster. The Voigtländer Noktons are all 0.95. That's probably two tiers faster?

    I'm not that familiar with MFT glass, so maybe 2.2 is a de facto standard that people are happy with? I just saw that the Veydras were also 2.2 (I remembered them being faster).

    Anyway, what exactly about it did you find amusing?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Member AndreeOnline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Zürich
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by joe12south View Post
    2. I do want to emphasize that I really forced a worst case scenario for the purple fringing. Unless your job is shooting chrome cars, I don't think it would show-up very often.
    I think it would show up everywhere: tree branches against the sky, edges of windows, around specular highlights.

    Quote Originally Posted by joe12south View Post
    3. Obviously, the price is the main attractor. If you don't care about cinema lens practicalities, then of course there are a lot of great lenses at about 2X the cost of the Meike.
    I'd like the price of a lens to be less than $1200, as I feel above that it's often a question of diminishing returns. I don't need cinema lenses. I prefer normal stills glass (the lenses I own myself) as I do at least as much photography as I do videography—and I don't need to buy dual setups when what I have works.

    I'd rather rent for the occasion if I feel I need cinema glass.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    425
    Maybe "amusing" wasn't the best word...it's interesting to me to see how over the last decade we've raced to "needing" faster and faster lenses even as cameras' light gathering capabilities have exponentially increased. People are filling their bags with what not long ago would have been considered "specialty" lenses. Is it really practical or advisable to shoot moving pictures with a T0.95? If I can't keep the tip of an actress' nose and the back of her head in focus at the same time, shouldn't I stop down a bit? My goal is to capture a performance, to tell a story, not to fetishize a certain look. A T4 equivalent is probably where most people should be shooting most of the time. (I'm talking about filmmaking - not live events, etc.)

    I do agree that in a perfect world, I'd have a complete set of cinema lenses that were tack sharp at the FF equivalent of T2.8. That would be the most flexible. But those lenses don't exist at a price that an indie filmmaker can afford to own. I think the closest you could get would be a Xeen at around $2,500 a piece, and they're kind of soft wide open.

    Would I rent the Meike? I doubt it. If I have a rental budget, I'll go ahead and get a big boy lens. But I know that I'm not alone in wanting a personal kit that I have at hand all the time for grabbing a day of shooting.
    Pocketluts: Purpose-built LUTs for the Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
    Pocketluts Store
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    151
    If the 25mm has a 50mm field of view then it’s not a veydra knock off in the optics.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Taikonaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,042
    Sorry not into these Meike Mouse lenses
    The bad CA ruins it for me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by rze View Post
    If the 25mm has a 50mm field of view then it’s not a veydra knock off in the optics.
    I'm not sure what you mean. The lens is what the lens is. A 25mm is a 25mm. The equivalency comes from what sensor you pair it with. On a standard M43 mount, both the Veydra and the Meike will yield a FOV equivalent of a 50mm lens on a full frame sensor. The Pocket 4K and the GH5S have an oversized sensor, so they crop a bit less than 2X.
    Pocketluts: Purpose-built LUTs for the Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
    Pocketluts Store
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Nice :)
    By Bxl in forum Lens Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-01-2016, 07:40 PM
  2. Cheap alternative to C-Fast for Ursa-Ursa Mini
    By Max Minoia in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-09-2016, 07:06 AM
  3. Nice work being done
    By Herb in forum Footage / Frames
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-11-2015, 11:05 AM
  4. Another cheap alternative to C-Fast
    By Brian@202020 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-24-2015, 01:17 PM
  5. Bmpc4k -- nice!!
    By Tim Joy in forum For Sale / Want to Buy
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-08-2014, 01:16 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •