Thread: DP, DOP or Cinematographer ?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11  
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    3,036
    And also this great piece by the wonderful Phil Méheux BSC whom I was lucky enough to sit next to at the ASC Awards a couple of years ago.

    He also views that the phrase DP is senior to the term cinematographer.

    "One feels that the term should be reserved for cinematographers who have a wealth of experience as the criteria for BSC Full Membership states"

    https://bscine.com/news?id=144

    JB
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Taikonaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,042
    Quote Originally Posted by GeranSimpson View Post
    Personally I think it's only possible to credit yourself on-screen as a "cinematographer" if you are basically one-man-banding it. It's pretty pretentious to claim you are responsible for everything on the screen when there are probably half a dozen or so people in the camera department alone. Writers and producers are overseeing the story, DP coordinating with the director on the look of each shot while the director coordinates with the executive producers and show creators.

    Cinematography, to my understanding, is the study of creating narrative through moving pictures. You could argue that everyone in the crew is a cinematographer for a narrative piece.

    Videography is capturing something unscripted like a concert or an interview.
    Not necessarily true. You don't have to be one man banding to credit yourself as a cinematographer. You could be working with a team of people but if you are the main person operating the camera you can still be the cinematographer. The DoP involves in charge of multiple units that can involve mutiple camera operators.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    716
    You know what? After reading this I think I will also stop using DP/DoP and Cinematographer interchangeably.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Wollongong, NSW Australia
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by John Brawley View Post
    There's no right or wrong because people use these terms very interchangeably. Here's my view.

    A cinematographer chooses or sets exposure, based on their lighting or subtraction of lighting.

    Camera operators generally do not, or do so under instruction from a Cinematographer, DP or lighting camera person.

    A DP is a cinematographer that oversees more than one camera team and often more than one unit.
    The first Director of Photography (he was also an accredited ACS member) I worked with many years ago explained it this way as well. He said it took him years before he could call himself a DoP.

    Really, it comes down to respect for the craft.

    After 25+ years, using at first video cameras, and now digital cinema cameras, I feel comfortable calling myself a cinematographer. Certainly for the type of work I do - documentary, music and corporate films. And that is ONLY after many discussions with other, more experienced cinematographers and accredited DoP's who have offered I can do so - in other words, I've demonstrated the knowledge and experience to carry that title. But I would never compare myself to a cinematographer working in narrative films - there's still SO much I'd have to learn yet. And as for calling myself a Director of Photography, I doubt I'd ever do that. Unless I decide to devote my life to that role, then I don't believe I'd ever be good enough.

    BTW, I never use the term "videographer." And don't like being called one. I think it comes from the wedding film industry - of which I've never participated, and never will. Sure, some people love making wedding films, and produce amazing creative work... it's just not for me.

    It took me years to feel comfortable calling myself a director, but that's effectively what I am. The creative decision maker for films, and in Australia that usually means you're an auteur. You have to own the story, and bring it to life yourself. But along the way, it's usually necessary to wear many hats - the more you wear, the greater your earning potential.
    Last edited by trispembo; 03-28-2019 at 08:42 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    1,538
    Great post. I really hadn't even considered the distinction between DP and Cinematographer with regards to multiple units and playing more into overseer.

    I don't think I've ever introduced myself as a "DP" or Cinematographer, just that I happen to be handling those duties when someone asks. When I once had to run down the basics of teaching a "DP" the basics of exposure and how to maintain it accurately between A B and C cameras, I realized I never... want to be the 'that' guy. In a big market, I'm sure these people get weeded out very quickly; everywhere else though you'll see anyone who actually purchased a camera for the purpose of shooting anything... gladly identify themselves as a DP.

    I think the title is what's earned and being credited as DP / Cinematographer etc, is different. Like, you can go off to war with emergency medicine training and do battlefield surgeries but I'd be hesitant to say that person would be competent as a Doctor in diagnosing illnesses and knowing the first thing about the subtleties of the medical field as a whole. I'll take credit but I'll never be the one to introduce myself as a Cinematographer / DP outside the context of an actual shoot.
    Test footage Vimeo page: https://vimeo.com/romanalaivi
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    2,009
    IMO, they are all just titles. I never cared for them. At the end, everyone is a filmmaker so I refer to myself as a filmmaker. So if anyone ask me what I do, I'm a filmmaker and I make movies. 99% of my ending credits are not my decision - I let the producer put whatever she/he wants for what I did for their movie. Some logs it as DP, others as Cinematographer, Editor, Colorist, Director, etc... I'm fine with whatever they decide to put on print. I get paid what I expect to be paid for what I did for that production and it's been good for me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    309
    I do think "Videographer" is more and more referring to one-man-band Video Producers and shooters. I've definitely acted as a "Videographer" and have been referred to as that, but only in corporate/commercial shoots. It's a term that's a lot more common in those spheres.

    Generally agree with EYu. I find that DP/Cinematographer are used interchangeably, at least by non-camera department. I don't think I'd ever correct anyone, either.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. American Cinematographer article
    By scorsesefan in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-23-2014, 03:31 PM
  2. festivals for cinematographer
    By twelvetwelves in forum Cinematography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-20-2014, 07:20 PM
  3. Looking for a Australian based Cinematographer
    By SamuelJacobPauling in forum For Hire
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-21-2013, 07:15 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-14-2013, 07:29 AM
  5. Looking for Cameraman/Cinematographer in Southern CA
    By JOSOCAcreative in forum For Hire
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-02-2013, 05:20 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •