Thread: The ideal prime for steadicam work

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11  
    Senior Member david evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by DanKanes View Post
    All of the sigma Art Prime lenses are 135 aka ff35 lenses so they will also cover+

    The 18-35 does cover at 20mm, but you're right it doesn't have the funk of a vintage lens.

    Is your Tokina 28-70 the Tokina Angenieux cross license lens? Definitely good funk in that lens... magic
    Yes, it's the angenieux. It's incredible what that lens can do. A real bargain for the money, even if you overpay for it. I'm currently shooting almost everything with it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member LochnessDigital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    503
    I really love my Contax 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, and 100 f/2. The 28mm f/2 is next on the list, for sure.
    Aaron Lochert
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member david evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    425
    Guys, I have a zeiss 50mm 1.4 planar for nikon which I ocasionally use with the UM4.6. Any difference between this lens and the contax version?

    Thanks
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member DPStewart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    3,061
    Quote Originally Posted by david evans View Post
    Guys, I have a zeiss 50mm 1.4 planar for nikon which I ocasionally use with the UM4.6. Any difference between this lens and the contax version?

    Thanks
    Good question.
    When I once looked into it I think I found they were the same optics, but that the Contax version was more easily converted to other mounts. ....IF I have that straight...
    Cameras: Blackmagic Cinema Camera, Blackmagic Pocket Camera (x2), Panasonic GH2 (x2), Sony RX100 ii, Canon 6D, Canon T2i,
    Mics: Sennheiser, AKG, Shure, Sanken, Audio-Technica, Audix
    Lights: Every Chinese clone you can imagine
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    USA N. CA
    Posts
    2,178
    The Contax version is slightly more compact in size, but the same design as the Zeiss ZF/ZE. The Contax C/Y version does have 1mm lens FFD, somis eaiser to change mounts, but a Canon EF mount can be put on both models, and this is the useually mount change.
    As DPStewart said, both are optically the same. But the 50mm is a Planar design, and not the same as the 28mm Distagon diesign. The 28mm f/2.0 is also a little smaller and lighter than the 50mm f/1.8.
    Cheers
    Last edited by Denny Smith; 12-30-2016 at 09:21 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    454
    If weight is an issue, you could look at getting the tiny Canon 24mm 2.8 pancake.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    247
    I also affirm the Zeiss 28mm f2. Though I don't own it, I have used a full set of ZE primes on a couple of shoots, and every time I almost exclusively used the 28mm. It's just an ideal lens and as others have said has a great dimensional look to it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member LochnessDigital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    503
    One of the reasons to go for the Contax over the newer Zeiss are to have an aperture ring while also having a focus ring that turns the cinema direction. If you get the ZE, you won't have an aperture ring. If you get the ZF (which you have), the focus goes the "wrong" way. It may not matter to you if you're pulling your own focus. That's up to you to decide, but if you're working with an AC, they'll want it to be the canon/cinema direction.
    Aaron Lochert
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    USA N. CA
    Posts
    2,178
    Good point on the focus direction. This is the biggest advantage of the Contax lens, but they go for an arm and leg when available.
    I have the Zeiss ZF version to get f/stop ring, my follow focus is reversible to correct the "backwards" focus of the Nikon mount. But as a former Ni,inmshooter, I always felt the other lenses were "backwards".
    Cheers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member Perry Mulder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Hulst, Netherlands
    Posts
    333
    I think in terms of ideal lens, specwise.. this Tokina comes pretty close, but it might be too expensive (arround 4k) for what you are looking for. Does anyone know if there are lenses with specs like this that are more within reach in terms of price?

    http://www.tokinacinema.com/16-28mm2-T3.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. BMPCC + Tascam DR-05? Ideal settings?
    By miwashi in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-07-2015, 05:36 AM
  2. BMPCC and Ninja 2, the ideal combo?
    By zwarte_kat in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-29-2013, 06:55 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-16-2012, 10:00 PM
  4. ideal $1k or less walkaround lens
    By imdjay in forum Lens Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-09-2012, 07:33 PM
  5. What would be your ideal system for working with BMC?
    By Paul Stephen Edwards in forum Workflow
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-09-2012, 11:47 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •